Genocide Again?
Congress just acknowledged it with a ‘non-binding Resolution’ that
passed 393 to 0. At least they agree on
something. But here’s the real
crime. They won’t do anything about
it. Again!
After the horrors of the Jewish Holocaust during World War
II the world said “Never Again!”. No one
could imagine allowing such a horrific crime against humanity to ever occur
again. But we have. Repeatedly. Since the end of World War II after the
United Nations General Assembly adopted the
Convention for the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide all nations have stood by and
watched it happened again, and again, and again, over 100 times!
At the cost of well over 22 million innocent people.
Now, we stand by again as ISIS continues to slaughter and
mutilate thousands. Why? One simple reason. We insist on national sovereignty trumping
human rights. Nations, including the
US, would rather stand by and allow the continued mass murder and mutilation of
Christians, Yazitis, Sunni and Shiite Muslims, and other religious minorities
than risk the lives of US solders stopping it.
Even peace activist and the peace movement has been silent. They appear
to be so averse to using military power anywhere that they flinch at the
prospect of it being used even to enforcing international law against mass
murder.
Their knee jerk reaction to the use of any military force is
as murderous as the knee jerk reaction of President Obama’s resistance to using
more forceful means than drones to stop the mass murder and rapes. Peace activists remain more concerned about
the use of drones and their inevitable murder of hundreds of innocent people as
collateral damage, than their concern about the mass murder of tens of
thousands by small pockets of violent extremists that those drone are targeting
to kill.
The definition of
Genocide is clear. And ISIS is still
conducting it nearly a year after this crime against humanity was first
identified.
Secretary of State
John Kerry did say we will “do all we can” to hold the perpetrators of genocide
accountable in a court of law, but he didn’t mention there is no global police
force to capture them or bring them to trial.
And by the time one is created, if one ever is, hundreds of thousands
could be killed. And the world remains
with no way of preventing it or the next genocide, or no real way of deterring
future genocides given that the existing international courts may not have the
technical jurisdiction over terrorist groups.
If ISIS were allowed to become a nation state and decided to sign onto
the ICC treaty, then it’s leaders would no longer be immune to prosecution.
That’s a little
loophole insisted upon by nation states (mostly the US) that never wanted their
own soldiers or leaders to be called before a tribunal if they were accused of
committing a war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide.
This the grand flaw
in the UN system. The structural
certainty that national sovereignty (legalized murder) will always trump the
protection of human rights.
Few people realize that more people were killed in the 20th century
from genocide, (unusually governments killing their own people) than from wars.
In the last century about 100 million people
died in wars and revolutions. During the
same time period nearly 160 million innocent people were killed in genocides by
their own governments. A right that
remains for all sovereign nations.
For now we must settle for the ‘moral authority” to
address genocide. Until ‘we the people’ create
the “political will” that is called for by the Commission on Global Security,
Justice and Governance, we will just have to let the protection of human rights
lay low on the global governance agenda.
U.S. Congressman Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb) a sponsor of
the unanimous resolution that passed Thursday said “I sincerely hope [it] will
raise international consciousness, end the scandal of silence, and create the
preconditions for the protection and reintegration of these ancient faith
communities into their ancestral homelands’.
What will it take for Rep. Fortenberry and others with
political levers to raise the necessary international cooperation that could
end the scandal of persistent inaction.
Action that is long overdue and essential to creating the conditions for
ending this genocide -- and preventing future genocides…and finally keeping the
world’s promise of “Never Again!”?
Months before the horrific
attacks on 9-11 a former Clinton administration bioethics adviser warned that
the completion of the human genome at time made development of bio-genetic
weapons nearly certain within five to 10 years and called for an international
commission to monitor genetic experiments that could lead to genocidal weapons.
Mr. Moreno, a University of Virginia biomedical ethics professor spoke at the
American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting in San
Francisco that year and said "You could identify a unique antigen in a
certain group of people and try to knock it out and create a blood disease,
such as anemia,"
Such unprecedented
weaponry is only a matter of time.
Voters this season are largely motivated by the
dysfunction of our own government. Regardless of how our elections turn out,
policy makers at every level need to start addressing the dysfunction of our
‘international law’ system and structures that lack any enforcement capacity -
and even less capacity to prevent future genocides, wars, pandemics and
terrorism (including bioterrorism) efforts that are inevitable. And, increasingly inevitable in a world
lacking any means of justice.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home