The problem with Charles Lane’s analysis of Sanders and the
Pope’s concern regarding income inequality and global poverty (Washington Post
4-14-16) is how he limits his
perspective to economics. His stats are
correct, but if he looks at national security threats to the US posed by the
remaining global poverty that capitalism and free trade have not helped, he
might change his tune.
Remaining deficits in global economic development still cause
the deaths of over 17,000 child deaths and 42,000 new refugees every day as a
result of war, hunger, extreme weather conditions, infectious disease,
terrorism, genocide and the persistent violation of other human rights. Each threat is a result of capitalism and
free trade’s failure to prevent.
Recent Senate testimony by Retired Marine Corps General,
(former) White House National Security Adviser and Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe, James Jones confirms what a 1980 bipartisan Presidential Commission on
World Hunger concluded.
“In the final analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an
increasingly interdependent world -- place far higher priority on overcoming
world hunger, its effects will no longer remain remote or unfamiliar. Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of
the precipice; the major actions required do not lend themselves to crisis
planning, patchwork management, or emergency financing... The hour is
late. Age-old forces of poverty,
disease, inequity, and hunger continue to challenge the world. Our humanity demands that we act upon these
challenges now...”.
President Jimmy
Carter’s Commission went on to warn about the rise in terrorism, environmental
degradation, wars and revolutions we could expect if we failed to make ending
hunger and the worst aspects of global poverty a top US national security
priority.
General Jones, Bono the musician, and even Republican Senator
Lindsey Graham, Chair of the
Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on Appropriations agree.
Unless we make global development a far
higher national security priority and make the resources available we won’t be
able to afford the economic consequences.
Even Mr. Lane must be aware that this global deficit of crisis
prevention funding will be bad for everyone.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home